November 2000 Minutes
LAUC-SD
Membership Meeting
November 14, 2000
2-4 p.m.
Seuss Room, Geisel Library
Meeting called to order at 2:04 by Harold Colson
-
-
Announcements
-
-
Harold thanked the membership for the various private accolades he received upon conducting his first membership meeting last September.
-
At the next membership meeting (February 20) D. Hoffman will speak about librarian roles in the development process
-
Harold welcomed visiting librarian Koichi Wada (he’ll be visiting several libraries to observe and learn).
-
The Fall Assembly is this weekend (Harold Colson, Jenny Reiswig and Christina Keil will be attending and reporting back).
-
Jenny announced that statewide professional governance has been asked to review and respond to Position Paper #1, related to the distinguished step; she wants feedback from the membership and possibly setting up a task force. More to come from Jenny later.
-
-
Academic Reviews - Brian & Anne
-
Brian Schottlaender remarks on peer review:
-
-
Thanked CAPA and ad hoc committees for their hard work.
-
This year was different for many reasons, including the fact that we have a new University Librarian, uncertainties about labor negotiations muddied waters in an unusual way (some guidelines might result from the current negotiations).
-
-
Our peer review process is very bureaucratic – LHR and CAPA are looking at ways to streamline the process
-
People are writing on corporate memory – people should not assume anything from the past; attend the workshops
-
AULs notably absent from the process; need to look at how/where to plug them in – there were instances where their feedback/presence could have been useful to move the file
Brian's impressions of "us":
-
-
23 candidates for review, 2 ended up being withdrawn
-
Quality of work in files was exceptional, both in terms of accomplishments on job and also on commitment to profession and university
-
UCSD has a reputation for having, employing first-quality librarians
-
Activities in criteria 2-4 are essential because they help us shape and guide the profession and the community
-
LAUC R&PD is to be congratulated on their work so far and he looks to working with them even more; encourages everyone to attend programs and also to shape up new programs
Anne Prussing’s Remarks: (handed out CAPA annual report)
-
It is an honor to look at the files and accomplishments of colleagues
-
21 files reviewed, 9 of them required ad hoc committees (which adds time to the process)
-
Only 2 files were in by the Feb 1st due dates; some were as late as 4 months; lateness is not just an inconvenience but it makes it hard to look at files equitably; you never know when there’ll be a need to request more information/documentation
-
Some of the files were so late that they required retroactive actions from campus HR
-
Initially, files were being reviewed under the old scales but the new scales become effective July 1st for non-represented librarians
-
CAPA participated in appointment of 10 new librarians
-
Reminder that the org chart is required not an option; supervisory duties also required
-
The position paper regarding the distinguished step had originally been sent to CAPA but it is now in the hands of Professional Governance
A lot of discussion followed. Some of the comments made:
-
-
Recommendation from Susan Starr that we have a no meetings week (who can make this decision?) so people can concentrate on their files.
-
Reminder that people can always turn in files early
-
Encourage review initiators to let other people know that they will need to write letters
-
There was a lot of discussion on professional activities percentage of time and whether or not items in criteria A should be allocated percentages of time, ranked in order of importance, etc. Professional development in SDM and not as percentage; except in very special circumstances such as being elected ALA president; concern that would make it appear as if you have to do those activities in your time because taking this out of the 100% total; current setup is not equitable; as professionals we don’t work 40 hours; percentages of time don’t make sense for professional jobs but they have a salary/level correlation for staff positions so why even have percentages? How about percentages only in criteria A. [Addendum from secretary: some more discussion followed at the workshops for the review process and CAPA is taking a recommendation from CAPA and LAUC-SD Executive Board to the membership on this issue]
EVERYONE WAS ENCOURAGE TO ATTEND ONE OF THE WORKSHOPS.
-
-
Visit by LAUC President Cathy Palmer
-
Presidential activities:
-
write charges, make appts,
-
campus visits (she thinks the vice-president should be the one doing the visits in the future, to get acquainted with the campuses before her/his term starts). As she goes to each campus, she is visiting the corresponding University Librarian
-
Planning LAUC assembly
-
-
LAUC-SD committee annual reports summaries
-
C. Haynes thanked A. Prussing and L. Barnhart for their work. A. Prussing is taking over as chair of Cultural Diversity; CDC website will be VAD generated; attendance at film at noon series has increased steadily (more films will be presented this year). Their report will be up on the web.
-
Bargaining update
-
No update since Bargaining Update #21; a meeting was taking place last Wednesday but we haven’t heard about it; new field representative Funeka Winsor (some people have met her)